How a TV Works in Slow Motion - The Slow Mo Guys

1. As GL1zdA already pointed out in blog comments 1992 Creative Video Blaster CT6000 was a single frame screen grabber and not a video encoding/decoding accelerator. YT "Creative Videoblaster CT6000 in action" [link] shows what it does. [link] "converts a standard full-motion video image (composite video source) into a format for display on a computer graphics monitor" emphasis on the _image_. "It can position and scale the video image onto the output display and allows the video image to be merged with computer graphics for interactive multimedia applicaiton." means overlay analog video on VGA monitor. The first true video decoding accelerator on PC market came out of David Sarnoff Research Center owned by RCA, later purchased by GE, then finally video tech carved out and sold to Intel. Called Digital Video Interactive [link] it did in fact "real time audio and video decompression, 30 frames per second with a resolution of 320x240". Intel repackaged it into one chip i750 and called it Indeo. Creative released a product based on it in mid 1994 - Video Blaster RT300. PCI bus was already mainstream in 1994, as were Pentiums. You most likely blurred those two together into one product. 2. "so the quality could be very high. Streams of 8 to 12 mbit of data for a single channel were no exception." SD video DVD bitrate is 10Mbit, and here we have OTA stations pushing 720p/1080i at same or lower bw using same codec (US mpeg2). Whole multiplexer in ATSC offers ~20Mbit, and then TV st

"The video makes it seems that there's no temporal bleeding on CRTs. This sounds unlikely to me..." There is, but I don't remember it being noticeable even on cheap TVs. I still miss the lack of motion blur that CRTs gave by default. I found a forum post where someone lists these values: "Phosphors in current use for CRT-applications: Red: phosphor = Y2O2S:Eu3+. Lifetime (1/e time) = 150 us, single exponential. Green: phosphor = Zn2SiO4:Mn2+. Lifetime (1/e time) = 10-15 ms. Clearly, this is quite long and is the limiting factor in increasing frame-frequency. Note: the emission decay has a highly non-single-exponential decay --> at long times (~1 s) still some emission can be observed by the eye. This can be seen clearly by looking into the green CRT directly after the image was switched off. However, the intensity is too low to cause problems in an active image when the image-frequency is below ~100 Hz. Blue: phosphor = ZnS:Ag,Cl. Lifetime (1/e time) = ~100-200 us. Note: not single-exponential decay, but no emission at long times. (Source: Shionoya & Yen, "Phosphor Handbook", 1998.)" [link] And in this high framerate video of a CRT you can see the different colors decay at different rates. Here the blue seems to decay the fastest. But they're all imperceptibly dark by the time the scan line comes around again. I have no idea if there's any cumulative effect that's perceptible. [this video] [link]

That's an oversimplification of the physics. CRT televisions have very low persistence phosphors. If you look at high-speed video of a CRT during a raster scan, the line is visible for far less time than the entire frame [1]. This technique relies on persistence of vision [2] to create the illusion of a complete frame. If you want to calculate the response time of a single dot on the phosphor, it is way down into the microseconds. I don't know enough about OLED displays to comment. I do know that LCDs don't even come close to the speed of CRTs at transitioning through high contrast images, the key to producing fast and responsive motion of sprites (which are high contrast against the background by design in most retro games). [1] [this video] [2] [link]