1 HN user recommended this talk1 month2017–2023score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN cites it in AI risk debates, sometimes as an argument that has aged well and sometimes as an example of alarmist framing.
Sam Harris argues in a TED talk that we will build superhuman AI and have not grappled with the risk of creating something that may treat us the way we treat ants. He makes a logical case for taking AI risk seriously.
I don't think many people are worried that what we have now is a major risk. The major concern is the implications of the trajectory we are now on. If you look at what ChatGPT and Midjourney and the like can do now compared to just a couple of years ago, it's pretty incredible. If you extrapolate the next few similar jumps in capability, and assume that won't be 20 years away, then what AI is going to be capable of before even my kids leave college is going to be mind-boggling, and in some possible futures not in a good way. I remember seeing this talk from Sam Harris nearly 6 years ago and it logically making a lot of sense back then ( [this video] ). The past couple of years have made this all the more prescient. (Worth a watch if you have 15 mins).
This made me think about Sam Harris's comparison between ourselves and John Van Neumann as analogous to a comparison between a chicken and ourselves. [1] [this video]
Harris compares von Neumann to us as we are to chickens
Even people giving TED talks about the threat of AI are unable to marshal an appropriate emotional response to the dangers that lie ahead: [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Citations, criticism and jokes