Cited on HN 3 times, 2013–2014, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN mostly cites it as a reference for the Google/NASA/D-Wave partnership and as a basic intro to quantum computing's potential.
A short Google video introducing the Quantum AI Lab, a partnership between Google, NASA, USRA and a 512-qubit D-Wave Two quantum computer. It covers the lab's early goals and some potential applications of quantum computing.
“It talks about some cool potential applications and attempts to break down the very basics.” (HN, 2014)
It's really strange to discuss putting weights of importance on topics you (and I) are tangibly quantify. I'm not even sure how anyone justifies claiming MS or Google research is _inferior_ to the other's. If we have that much insight into what is superior, then surely we've already won and know where to throw our bucks? Regardless, Google already does plenty of work in these fields. This year, they've expanded to partnerships with NASA, USRA, and D-Wave with a new AI Lab -- [this video] .
Google's partnership with NASA and D-Wave on a quantum AI lab
Google also released a video[1] describing their joint investment in a D-Wave "quantum computer" (given the debates I've left it in quotes) with NASA. It talks about some cool potential applications and attempts to break down the very basics. What I'm wondering is if the investments into quantum computing by Google is merely them sinking left over R&D cash or if they believe that powerful quantum computers can be achieved relatively soon? 1 - [this video]
Describes potential applications and basics of quantum computing
Here is another article today bashing the D-Wave Two computers: [link] These machines are testing a completely new computing concept. We're trying to learn how they work so that we can apply that to building machines that can actually outperform traditional computers, and once that's achieved then the potential benefit will be enormous. According to [link] as you scale up qubits the power demands do not increase. That alone has huge potential. Maybe new materials need to be developed to see the full potential of these computers, lots of research needs to be done. Why are all of these articles so pessimistic? NASA, Lockheed, and Google purchasing these multi-million dollar machines should indicate that there is at-least some potential and value in the D-Wave computers, even if in the end they just learn what D-Wave did wrong. [this video] "We don't know the best questions to ask the quantum computers, that's what we're trying to find out now."
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more