HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Peter Singer - ordinary people are evil Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Peter Singer - ordinary people are evil

Jeffrey Kaplan
Lectures
YouTube
2 HN users recommended this lecture2 months2023–2026 score 2.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN recommends it as the best short exposition of Singer's argument for a duty to give.

Philosopher Jeffrey Kaplan summarizes Peter Singer's 1972 essay 'Famine, Affluence, and Morality', arguing that failing to give to save lives is morally comparable to letting a child drown. It is a short lecture on the argument's structure.

“I think the video is the best short exposition but you could try reading the paper the video is about” (HN, 2026)

1 strong recommendations · 1 recommendations · 2 citations · Lectures · intro

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@nextaccountic Jul 2026 Strongly recommends
on HN thread Grok Build Is OSS
Read more
> If I gave $500 to kids cancer research every year for 5 years, and then I don't give this year, do I have blood on my hands every time a kid dies of cancer from now on? And if you didn't ever donate, you don't? > How does this work? Okay, since the topic at hand is steelmanning, that is, replying to the strongest possible argument, let's practice that. I invite you to watch this video, which is a short lecture that indeed exposes the strongest argument for this exact proposition. [this video] (Peter Singer - ordinary people are evil) I think the video is the best short exposition but you could try reading the paper the video is about [link] Or reading about the paper [link]
Short lecture giving the strongest argument for duty to give.
@guerrilla Mar 2025 Recommends
on HN thread Stoicism's appeal to the rich and powerful (2019)
> I don't see why you should feel guilt. You should feel guilty because you can do something about other people's suffering, instead of being a greedy hoarder who has far more than he could possibly use in multiple lifetimes while other people starve and live miserable lives due to the system you benefit from. I think Peter Singer makes the argument very well [1] but many others in the history of philosophy have done just as good a job. Even Rawls is an option. 1. [this video]
Presents Singer's argument on obligation to help others.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@rektide May 2023 Cites it
on HN thread Animals Are Dying in Droves. What Are They Telling Us?
Peter Singer's Famine Affluence & Morality (1972) argued similarly, that we allow human suffering & don't do anything, even though we could. And he said that makes us provably evil. Recent submission, a video on Singer's paper: [link] [this video]
Video on Singer's 1972 paper about duty to relieve suffering.
@aamargulies Dec 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Hit men aren't what you think
You’re being facetious, but Peter Singer made this exact point about “ordinary people being evil” in a famous philosophy essay in 1972. [this video]
Singer's argument that ordinary people are evil.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close