HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from How Wolves Change Rivers [REMASTERED HD] - George Monbiot Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

How Wolves Change Rivers [REMASTERED HD] - George Monbiot

Sustainable Human
Explainers
YouTube
2 HN users recommended this explainer2 months2023–2025 score 2.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN cites it as a compelling example of unforeseen ecosystem effects and rewilding.

A short narrated video describing how reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone triggered a trophic cascade that changed wildlife, vegetation and even river courses. This is a remastered HD version of George Monbiot's viral piece.

“probably one of the most fascinating videos on YouTube” (HN, 2023)

1 strong recommendations · 1 recommendations · 1 citations · Explainers

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@sakopov Dec 2023 Strongly recommends
on HN thread Colorado wolf reintroduction to move forward
Seems most fitting than ever to post this. How wolves change rivers is probably one of the most fascinating videos on YouTube [1] 1: [this video]
Shows how reintroduced wolves reshaped Yellowstone's rivers.
@thangalin Jul 2025 Recommends
on HN thread Return of wolves to Yellowstone has led to a surge in aspen trees
[this video] "Embark on a journey to Yellowstone, where a few wolves did not just roam, but rewrote the rules of an entire ecosystem. Discover how these majestic predators triggered a cascade of life, transforming not only the park's wildlife but its very rivers and landscapes. It's a story of how nature's architects can reshape our world in ways we never imagined."
Wolves triggered a cascade transforming Yellowstone's wildlife and rivers.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@mandmandam Apr 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Long Reviled as 'Ugly,' Sea Lampreys Get Some Respect (2023)
Read more
> Why would the years of life on earth (or evolution) matter for species alive today being of "ecological importance" or not? It matters because we're not that smart . A species deemed "inessential" to ecological importance might very well turn out to be critical for unforeseen, even unforeseeable reasons. Not just to the species itself, which you seem to discount despite their ancient pedigree, but even to us through second order effects. The amount of time a species has been around is a strong clue that they're fulfilling a role in the ecosystem. Nature doesn't really do 'superfluous'; everything connects. Not in a hippy dippy way, but in the realest way, and in ways beyond our comprehension. The classic examples when I was growing up of 'nature being wasteful' - the appendix and 'junk DNA' - have now been revised... Because we learned more. No one knew how wolves change rivers [0] until it was studied. In hindsight it's obvious and makes perfect sense, but we didn't deem wolves "essential" when we killed them all. 0 - [this video]
Example of unforeseen ecosystem effects of species.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close