Yes Minister covers it well: [this video] Tell them you're going to have their messages scanned on behalf of the government and nobody wants it. Tell them you're going to introduce measures for online safety and to crack down on child abuse, and everybody wants it. Unless you're pre-informed on the issues, whoever presents it to you can just pick the side that gets you to the answer they want.
Sketch showing how question framing manipulates survey results.
When talking surveys, it's always imperative to bring up this scene from Yes, Prime Minister which describes how these surveys work - [this video] For reference, National Service was a national conscription service between 1949 and 1963. Since then a lot of conservative-leaning folks have been clammering about saying that bringing it back would fix the badly behaving youth.
Scene describing how survey wording steers results.
> kind of a fringe take (PS: I just finished watching the movie Her and am in a weird place) I thought we are closer to robot soldiers, Geoffrey Hinton said US army wants to have 50% robots by 2030, seems strange to invest in human soldiers when they are gonna have T-800 fairly soon. Is there some populist reason for conscription, or perhaps a weird twist to get into UBI? Reminded me of this episode of Yes, Prime Minister: [this video] are you worried about the raising crime amongst teenagers, do you think there is a lack of discipline in schools, do you think our young people lack authority and leadership in their lives, would you be in favor of introducing national service? are you worried about the danger of war, are you worried about the growth of armaments, do you think there is danger in giving young people guns and teaching them how to kill, do you think its wrong to force people to take up arms against their will? would you oppose the reintroduction of national service?
Episode on leading survey questions about national service.
It's all about how you ask the question; there would be a lot of people who want a thing _called_ small government, because they have been told that that is a good thing, but the _benefits_ of big government (ideally without the _costs_ of big government, but realistically most people in the US do not care about the deficit; if they did Trump would already have been deposed). Sir Humphrey summarises it fairly well, as usual: [this video]
Sir Humphrey on how question wording shapes opinion.
Is it popular? I’m a parent and none of my parent friends like it. I suspect this law isn’t popular. Just the messaging of doing nothing is more unpopular. So it gets spun as this is popular. [this video]
Used to suggest popularity is spun through messaging.
Social Studies practitioners' surveys, for which they use statistics, depend heavily on the wording of the questionnaire. [this video] It's not a science.
Your solution (of tackling unemployment by tacking it onto national defense), is eerily close to what they discussed in an episode of Yes Prime Minister in the 80s. [link] [this video]
Episode discussing tackling unemployment through national defense.
I was wondering when we’d see this. There are so many variables in these things, that it’s damn near impossible to do truly neutral studies; especially if there’s any money to be made. [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
10 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more