HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Clojure for Lisp Programmers Part 1 - Rich Hickey Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Clojure for Lisp Programmers Part 1 - Rich Hickey

38 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this talk1 month2017–2019 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Referenced for Hickey's reasoning on design choices such as macros and not building on SBCL.

Rich Hickey presents an extensive introduction to Clojure at the Boston Lisp meeting, assuming prior Lisp knowledge. It covers the language's design decisions relative to other Lisps.

“this is not only a very good introduction to Clojure and the design decisions made by Rich Hickey” (HN, 2019)

1 recommendations · 2 citations · Talks · intermediate

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@tosh Jul 2019 Recommends
on HN thread Clojure for Lisp Programmers (2008)
Context: this is not only a very good introduction to Clojure and the design decisions made by Rich Hickey it also is a video that isn't very widely known. The video was uploaded to Youtube after the migration from Blip.tv but somehow got broken ( [this video] ) and lived in a parallel universe in Youtube. I remember I found the video a few years ago but was unable to watch it. Last year someone re-uploaded the video to Youtube and it seems to works now. Transcript: [link]
Intro to Clojure and its design decisions by Rich Hickey

Citations, criticism and jokes

@joe-user Nov 2017 Cites it
on HN thread Effective Programs: 10 Years of Clojure
> Pity he hadn't heard of Armed Bear Common Lisp ( [link] ), which runs on the JVM. He was certainly aware of SBCL. He had a number of reasons for not wanting to use it. [1] > I don't mind mutable state, since the real world is not functional: I hear this argument often, but the "real world" is not linked lists or hash maps or mutable or 0s and 1s either, but they are all useful representations. > real programs are all about side effects Clojure has plenty of facilities for side effects, and without having to resort to monads (though you could if you wanted). [1]: [this video]
Rich Hickey's reasons for not using SBCL
@aidenn0 Jan 2019 Cites it
on HN thread Scripting in Common Lisp
Read more
Hy may have changed since I last looked at it, but when I had looked at it, Hy was more of an s-expression syntax bolted onto python. Some random thoughts on why this matters: Clojure is very much not a thin s-expression layer for java; that would have been terrible (Python is more like lisp than java which is why Hy is tenable whatsoever). In particular, CL style macros with out some first-class concept of symbols are a footgun[1], but I'm sure I could find other issues. Another item that can't be ignored is that Hy selected the clojure syntax, which is going to be a turn-off for anyone coming from Lisp or Scheme. Finally, there are hundreds of thin s-expression layers on top of existing languages, and most of them are terrible; Hy has done nothing to stand out from this crowd, so most lispers will not look closely at it. 1: See [this video] for Rich's discussion of how he managed this issue in Clojure.
Rich Hickey on handling macro symbol issues in Clojure

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close