HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Onboard quadrocopter failsafe: flight after actuator failure Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Onboard quadrocopter failsafe: flight after actuator failure

Mark Mueller
Demos
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this demo1 month2014–2019 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

It is the standard citation in drone and eVTOL threads for the claim that multirotors can survive a failed rotor with the right control algorithm.

ETH Zurich researchers demonstrate a quadrocopter that keeps flying stably after losing a motor and propeller entirely, with the algorithm running onboard while a pilot flies it.

“controlled, safe landings of quadrotors with a single failed motor have been demonstrated, see this ETH Zurich video from 2014” (HN, 2019)

1 recommendations · 3 citations · Demos · intermediate

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@raynr Aug 2019 Recommends
on HN thread Swiss Post Suspends Drone Delivery Service After Second Crash
As an additional potential recovery mode: ETH Zurich's Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control [0] has done amazing work on quadcopter recovery after rotor control loss [1] (I believe they are down to controlled flight with only one or two rotors left, but I cannot find the link right now). I've been waiting for this to filter into the real world but have yet to see it. [0] [link] [1] [this video]
Amazing ETH Zurich work on quadcopter recovery after rotor loss.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@rtkwe Jul 2014 Cites it
on HN thread Beijing From Above, aka How I was police detained for flying a Quadcopter
Read more
You can't pull autorotation with fixed pitch blades, at least not in any meaningful manner. Light quads can fall pretty slowly with pinwheeling motors but that's not actually autorotation. The way a helicopter is able to autorotate is to pull negative pitch, which spins the rotors using the fall energy of the copter, then shortly before crashing pulling back to positive pitch and using the still spinning blades to slow down to a controlled landing. For motor failure ETH Zurich has some research out there about recovering to normal(ish) flight after a prop loss. The quad goes into a pretty rapid spin but it's still controllable, link below to an outside the lab test. [this video]
ETH Zurich flight test recovering from propeller loss.
@SolarNet Jan 2018 Cites it
on HN thread SureFly – a personal helicopter designed for safe and easy flight
Actually that's a benefit of the quad-copter design. It can sacrifice an axis of control in that situation (a "minor" one, like rotation about the gravity vector). In this case it would likely make the passengers sick, but it would still be able to fly in a controllable fashion. See this video: [this video]
Shows a quadcopter staying controllable after losing an axis of control.
@mikepurvis Aug 2019 Cites it
on HN thread Swiss Post Suspends Drone Delivery Service After Second Crash
This isn't quite true. Cheap drones may not have this capability, but controlled, safe landings of quadrotors with a single failed motor have been demonstrated, see this ETH Zurich video from 2014: [this video] Obviously there are still other single points of failure such as the battery or controller, but at this point there's no excuse for crash landing a commercial drone just because a single motor (or rotor) has failed.
Demonstrates controlled safe landing of a quadrotor with a failed motor.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close