HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from [844] No Picking Required: Amazon’s Defective Choice Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

[844] No Picking Required: Amazon’s Defective Choice

8 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
Cited on HN 4 times, 2019, never outright recommended score 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN cites it, along with the rest of the series, as evidence that Amazon's Choice badges do not mean good quality.

A LockPickingLawyer video showing that a padlock sold as an Amazon's Choice high-security product can be opened trivially, with no picking needed.

4 citations · Demos · news from the time

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@jedimastert Jun 2019 Cites it
on HN thread What does it mean when a product is “Amazon’s Choice”?
Read more
I see two problems. First, the Amazon rating system is untrustworthy. There is simply far too much counterfeit reviewing and far too little done about it. This is a systemic problem that just needs to be fixed for the platform as a whole. The more nuanced problem, I think, is the fact that it can create a feedback loop. Something can be popular simply because it's cheap, but "Amazon's Choice" implies quality, which makes people think they're getting a deal because it's also cheap. What sprung to mind for me was LockpickingLawyer's[1] series on Amazon's Choice for things like "padlock", lock, and safe, all of which were of fairly low quality, or at least lower quality than "Amazon's Choice" would suggest. The problem is that, most of the time, people aren't going to know that what they have is low quality because it will almost never get tested and most people don't know anything about lock security. So they trust Amazon to tell them, when really it's the blind leading the blind [1]: [link] [2]: [this video]
Series showing Amazon's Choice locks are low quality.
@partialrecall Sep 2019 Cites it
on HN thread Amazon Changed Search Algorithm in Ways That Boost Its Own Products
I get the "thieves don't pick locks" thing, but I really think it's sleazy as hell if a lock marketed as "high security" can be raked open in one second. That's a low-skill attack. In this case he didn't even have to rake it, because the locks were unshielded: [this video] An unshielded padlock may as well be a warded lock like you'd find on a child's diary.
High-security padlock opened trivially because it was unshielded.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close