HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo -- Michael Betancourt (Part 1) Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo -- Michael Betancourt (Part 1)

MLSS Iceland 2014
Lectures
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this lecture3 months2017–2024 score 3.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN people return to it as a clear primer on MCMC and HMC and on why high dimensions behave counterintuitively.

Michael Betancourt's lecture at MLSS Iceland 2014 on efficient Bayesian inference with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. It covers MCMC concepts and motivation and the problems of sampling in high-dimensional distributions.

“it was a fantastic primer on the basic concepts and motivations of mcmc, and later hmc” (HN, 2022)

1 strong recommendations · 2 recommendations · Lectures · advanced

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@srs70187 Nov 2017 Recommends
on HN thread Gaussian Distributions Are Soap Bubbles
This is an interesting take and kudos to the author for relaying a helpful way to think about high dimensional distributions. I really like and often come back to this talk by Michael Betancourt where the theme is quite similar: [this video]
Betancourt talk on high-dimensional distributions and Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
@euW3EeBe May 2024 Recommends
on HN thread Gradient descent visualization
Read more
Not an expert in this field, but I'm guessing this is related to unintuitive nature of geometry in high-dimensional spaces. One rough example I can think of is the fact that the number of ways to move away from the origin increases exponentially (or even faster?) as the dimensionality goes up. There is _way_ more volume away from the origin than near it, I've seen this explained as something like "most of the volume of a high-dimensional orange is in the peel". One result of this is the fact that samples of a standard gaussian end up forming a "shell" as opposed to a "ball" that you would expect (this phenomenon is called the concentration of measure in general). Also, very roughly, high-dimensional objects have lots of corners, and these corners are also very sharp. I would guess that gradient descent would get stuck in these corners and have a hard time getting out. Some links related to this: - Spikey Spheres: [link] - Thinking outside the 10-dimensional box - 3blue1brown: [link] - This is a fairly long talk about HMC, but it does talk about some problems that come up when sampling high-dimensional distributions: [this video]
Long talk covering problems sampling high-dimensional distributions with HMC

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close