Cited on HN 3 times, 2024–2025, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN commenters cite it as the video version of the research on the social cost of driving when arguing cars impose uncompensated costs on others.
CityNerd's Ray Delahanty tallies the personal costs of driving and then the externalities that car dependency imposes on everyone else, with numbers for each. It is an urbanist case that driving is heavily subsidized and costs society far more than drivers pay.
“each mile you drive in your car incurs costs on the rest of society that nobody directly pays” (HN, 2024)
I think the mentioned report is "Transport transitions in Copenhagen: Comparing the cost of cars and bicycles" at [link] Along these lines, in a less scholarly form: "Cost-benefit of cycling infrastructure" - [link] "Making the Economic Case for Cycling" - [link] A related paper is "The social cost of automobility, cycling and walking in the European Union", [link] That paper has a YouTube version on the CityNerd channel, "Cars Are A Disaster For Society -- Here Are the Numbers " [this video]
Video version of the paper on the social cost of automobility.
I think about this the other way around. The federal government and other states have artificially low gas taxes that are a direct subsidy of gasoline car dependence. A state like California imposing a tax like this makes them one of the few states that's actually aware how much the consumption of a gallon of gas costs society and manages to charge someone for it. - The federal gas tax has been 18.4 cents per gallon since 1993, and has not increased to account for inflation - Vehicles are more fuel efficient than in the past, which has reduced the demand for gas by the gallon on an individual basis. - The cost of infrastructure materials has increased (e.g., building new roads and bridges) There is a very decent argument to be had that nobody is actually paying the societal cost of driving, that all of society just loses value by driving. In other words, each mile you drive in your car incurs costs on the rest of society that nobody directly pays, and therefore everyone pays. [this video]
Supports argument that driving imposes uncompensated costs on society.
> TLDR, UK road users pay for far more than the road network. Right, but driving has far more externalities than just the cost of the roads. For example: > Results suggest that each kilometer driven by car incurs an external cost of €0.11, while cycling and walking represent benefits of €0.18 and €0.37 per kilometer. Extrapolated to the total number of passenger kilometers driven, cycled or walked in the European Union, the cost of automobility is about €500 billion per year. Due to positive health effects, cycling is an external benefit worth €24 billion per year and walking €66 billion per year. From "The Social Cost of Automobility, Cycling and Walking in the European Union", [link] (which I heard about from a CityNerd video [this video] )
Source for the externalities of driving versus cycling and walking.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more