6 HN users recommended this commentary6 months2016–2022score 7
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN commenters pass it around as an eye-opening first-hand account of patent trolling and the Texas courts that favor it.
Austin Meyer, developer of the X-Plane flight simulator, explains how he was sued by a patent troll over a trivial claim about an app's license server. He walks through how the shell-company litigation works and why ignoring the suit makes things worse.
“This video from Austin Meyer (creator of X-Plane) is pretty eye-opening” (HN, 2017)
This is great. Would like to see more of these kinds of efforts. Just watched The Patent Scam video by Austin Meyer (developer of X-Plane flight sim who was sued by patent trolls). [this video] That kind of stuff makes my blood boil.
X-Plane developer recounts being sued by patent trolls
This video from Austin Meyer (creator of X-Plane) is pretty eye-opening: [this video] Apparently there are TWO judges in the district, BOTH of whose own sons are lawyers in the same district. And BOTH sons handle a lot of the patent litigation, in front of their own fathers, the judges. Pretty incredible. Watch the video starting at about 5 minutes to see it.
Two Texas judges whose lawyer sons handle patent cases before them
So there is a judge out there, and his son is a practicing lawyer who reps. PT and PT victims. Basically legal racketeering. It would be interesting to see emails dumped from these guys, and how much corruption is taking place. [this video] its like 5 min in.
Judge and son lawyer enabling patent troll litigation in Texas
For anyone looking for an ~20 minute intro to why this is a big deal and the impact it has on small tech companies: [this video] tl;dw: There are some over-broad patents on usage of very common technologies ( using wifi or selling on the google play store are two egregious examples) that are being used as a bludgeon against small and medium sized firms that can't afford to defend themselves. It costs about $3 million to defend against such a suit, and the Eastern district is known for refusing to force plaintiffs to pay defendant's attorney's fees even if the suit is ultimately dropped.
Short intro to how overbroad patents hurt small tech companies
URL: [this video] (Austin Myers) URL: [link] (John Olivier) Above two YouTube videos I’ve been passing around in regard to sometimes peculiar nature of patents law in US and in particular that of eastern district of TX.
Explains peculiar US patent law and the eastern Texas district
Just watched this video [1] by someone who got sued because his "android app uses a license server". Those patent troll shell companies sue one victim after another and forward the incoming money to other companies. So there's no use in going after them directly. The victim can negotiate better terms if he signs a non-disclosure agreement. The patent trolls are protected by politicians, judges and lawyers. [1] [this video]
Developer sued over license server explains troll shell-company tactics
All patents should be worthless, the fact that trolls can come after anyone for uploading an app to google play store for fees and win because of some obscure patent is ridiculous. [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
8 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Citations, criticism and jokes