HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from 56 High Speed Rail Links We Should've Built Already Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

56 High Speed Rail Links We Should've Built Already

5 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this commentary3 months2024–2025 score 3.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN recommends it as a methodical argument that many US city pairs make economic sense for high-speed rail.

CityNerd lays out a data-driven method for deciding where high-speed rail should be built in North America and identifies 56 city pairs that justify it, based on population and distance.

“CityNerd identifies 56 train segments that should be built, using data and reasonable, precedented criteria” (HN, 2024)

1 strong recommendations · 2 recommendations · 1 citations · Commentary

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@theluketaylor Feb 2024 Strongly recommends
on HN thread Spain's plan to ban domestic flights where you can take a train in under 2.5 hrs
The CityNerd youtube channel recently did a list of city pairs ideally suited for high speed rail based on Spain's own network. spoiler alert: the northeast corridor plays a pretty heavy part, but it's not the only place in the US high speed rail makes a ton of sense. Highly recommended. [this video]
City pairs suited for high speed rail
@browningstreet Apr 2024 Recommends
on HN thread San Francisco-to-L.A. overnight train inches closer to reality
CityNerd identifies 56 train segments that should be built, using data and reasonable, precedented criteria: [this video] His video description: "Nothing that exists in North America fits the definition of true high-speed rail. If we actually ever started building a network, where would we start? And how would we know when we were done? This video details a methodology for answering all those questions, then counts up 56 city pairs we really should've had high-speed rail service between long, long ago."
Data-driven methodology picking 56 rail segments
@alistairSH May 2024 Recommends
on HN thread General Motors Streetcar Conspiracy
Read more
Mixed answer. One driving factor in the creation of the interstate system was military - we wanted the ability to easily move troops/supplies across the US without airlift or rail. Not sure that's still a valid need (as in, I don't know - would need to ask a general). Also, the US is huge. We do need some sort of road system to get across it. Building rail to everywhere is prohibitively expensive. That said, we should/could have good high speed rail in the densest areas. Like expand the Acela corridor CityNerd does a nice summary of city pairs that should have high speed rail based on population and distance... [this video] tl;dr - DC-NYC tops the list (and include Philly and Balt). LA to SF is near the top. Chicago-DET-Toronto is up there. And on down the list. Basically, there's no good reason (other than momentum/history) to not build out solid rail networks over parts of the US. I don't think anybody reasonably expects an LA-NYC link any time soon because flying is a better option for now.
Good summary of city pairs for high speed rail

Citations, criticism and jokes

@jodrellblank Oct 2025 Cites it
on HN thread Uv is the best thing to happen to the Python ecosystem in a decade
Read more
> there are vast stretches of the country where trains just do not make economic sense There are plenty of city pairs where high speed trains do make economic sense and America still doesn't have them . [1] is a video "56 high speed rail links we should've built already" by CityNerd. And that's aside from providing services for the greater good instead of for profit - subsidizing public transport to make a city center more walkable and more profitable and safer and cleaner can be a worthwhile thing. The US government spends a lot subsidizing air travel. > So no, I don't think Europeans who haven't been in America have quite absorbed just how vast America is China had some 26,000 miles of high speed rail two years ago, almost 30,000 miles now connecting 550 cities, and adding another couple of thousand miles by 2030. A hundred plus years ago America had train networks coast to coast. Now all Americans have is excuses why the thing you used to have and tore up is impossible, infeasible, unafordable, unthinkable. You have reusable space rockets that can land on a pillar of fire . If y'all had put as much effort into it as you have into special pleading about why it's impossible, you could have had it years ago. [1] [this video]
Cited as proof many US city pairs justify HSR

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close