HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Why Machines That Bend Are Better Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Why Machines That Bend Are Better

92 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this explainer3 months2019–2021 score 3.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN commenters like it as a high-quality, accessible look at an under-appreciated engineering idea and bring it up in snap-fit and hinge discussions.

Veritasium explores compliant mechanisms, devices that move by flexing rather than using hinges and joints, with researchers at BYU. It covers advantages such as fewer parts and precision, including uses in nuclear weapon safety.

“Veritasium videos are pretty darn high quality.” (HN, 2020)

1 strong recommendations · 2 recommendations · 1 citations · Explainers

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@mehrdadn Aug 2020 Strongly recommends
on HN thread Astronomers solve the missing baryon problem
Veritasium videos are pretty darn high quality. Fun to watch and learn from, sometimes mindblowingly. Definitely recommend subscribing. One of my favorites is Derek's video on compliant mechanisms: [this video]
Favorite Veritasium video on compliant mechanisms.
@missosoup Nov 2019 Recommends
on HN thread SpaceX's Starship Mk1 just blew off its bulkhead in a pressurization accident
There wouldn't be much to 'leak'. The nuclear material in weapons is relatively safe to handle as long as you don't ingest it. It's the post-explosion fission products that are nasty. Also with nuclear weapons, as much engineering has gone into safety as into weapon design itself. It's astronomically improbable for a modern nuclear weapon to detonate prior to arming even if the explosive lens is set off. The reentry vehicle is designed to come down at circa mach 14 so a little bit of heat and jostling isn't going to bother it. Cool video about some of the engineering involved: [this video]
Engineering involved in warhead design and safety.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@seg_lol Aug 2021 Cites it
on HN thread Powering the Lunar Base
Read more
One could use compliant hinges [1] to help mitigate moon dust issues, those will have to be dealt with anyway. Found the link [link] > Light Bender is a novel concept for the generation and distribution of power on the lunar surface within the context of the Artemis mission and the “Long-Term Human Lunar Surface Presence” that will follow. The innovative concept is based on a heliostat that utilizes Cassegrain telescope optics as the primary means to capture, concentrate and focus the sun's light. A second key innovation is the use of a Fresnel lens to collimate this light for distribution to multiple end users at distances of a kilometer or more away without substantial losses. The redirected and concentrated solar energy is then converted to electricity at the end user’s location using small (2m-4m diameter) photovoltaic arrays that can be mounted on habitats, cryo-coolers, or mobile assets such as rovers or ISRU elements. This concept is superior to alternatives such as highly inefficient Laser Power Beaming, as it only converts light to electricity once, and to traditional power distribution architectures that rely on mass intensive cables. [1] [link] [link] [this video] This is a great recent example of a joystick adapter using compliant mechanisms, [link]
Compliant hinges proposed to handle lunar dust issues.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close