HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Matter to Mind:Bioelectricity, Body Intelligence, Future of Regenerative Medicine- Dr. Michael Levin Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Matter to Mind:Bioelectricity, Body Intelligence, Future of Regenerative Medicine- Dr. Michael Levin

Harvard Extension Student Psychological Club
Talks
YouTube
2 HN users recommended this talk2 months2023–2024 score 2.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Recommended as an approachable look at Levin's work on regrowth and collective cellular intelligence, and used as an example of intelligence beyond brains.

Developmental and synthetic biologist Michael Levin speaks at a Harvard Extension student event on bioelectricity, body intelligence and regenerative medicine. He discusses how cell electrical networks guide growth and form.

“Do watch his lectures, it's some really fascinating stuff.” (HN, 2023)

1 strong recommendations · 1 recommendations · 2 citations · Talks

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@grishka Jul 2023 Strongly recommends
on HN thread An ultra-sensitive on-off switch helps axolotls regrow limbs
Read more
Whenever morphogenesis comes up, especially with the usual "work from DNA and proteins up" approach, I feel obliged to mention Michael Levin. He also researches morphogenesis, except his approach is on a higher abstraction level. He manipulates the electrical network that cells use to communicate with each other to organize their work towards multicellular goals. Do watch his lectures, it's some really fascinating stuff. You don't need to touch genes at all to regrow limbs and organs. Neither do you need to operate on that low level to cure cancer. This whole "let's effect organism-level changes by observing and manipulating DNA and proteins" feels to me like "let's add a feature to a react web app by observing and modifying the behavior of individual transistors in the CPU". Doable given enough time, but you'd drown in complexity in the process. [this video]
Levin lectures on regrowing limbs by manipulating cell electrical networks.
@ly3xqhl8g9 Jun 2023 Recommends
on HN thread Q&A: How DARPA hacked a science writer’s brain andturned her into a sharpshooter
Read more
The article makes no mention of Michael Levin [1], one of the main researchers/labs, around bioelectricity/xenobots. A recent talk of his [2]. Secondly, bioelectricity has nothing or very little to do with electric currents as the one from the socket. There is no "brain zapping" involved or required. In the paper [3] detailing an adult frog limb amputation and full regeneration over 18 months, Michael Levin's lab used a single bioreactor with silk hydrogels applied only for 24 hours (see BioDome fabrication in the paper). [1] [link] [2] "From Matter to Mind: Bioelectricity, Body Intelligence, and the Future of Regenerative Medicine", [this video] At minute 33, [this video] : "We don't use any applied fields, no frequencies, no waves, no electromagnetic radiation, no magnets, what we do is we control the native interface by which cells control each other, that is the set of electrical controls that they expose to each other, and you can do this with drugs, with ion channel mutants, with optogenetics and various others techniques." [3] "Acute multidrug delivery via a wearable bioreactor facilitates long-term limb regeneration and functional recovery in adult Xenopus laevis", [link]
Levin talk showing bioelectric control needs no applied fields.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@grishka Jun 2023 Cites it
on HN thread How scientists are hacking the genetic code to give proteins new powers
It gets wilder. In a 3D printer, the commands come from a computer and the current state is maintained in its memory as well. In a multicellular biological system, that state is stored within the thing itself that is being built . And the commands come from it self-organizing. [this video]
Levin on state stored in the built organism itself.
@trane_project Dec 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Does current AI represent a dead end?
Read more
I think most AI research up to this day is a dead end. Assuming that intelligence is a problem solvable by computers implies that intelligence is a computable function. Nobody up to this day has been able to give a formal mathematical definition of intelligence, let alone a proof that it can be reduced to a computable function. So why assume that computer science is the key to solving a problem that cannot even be defined in terms of math? We had formal definitions of computers decades before they became a reality, but somehow cannot make progress in formally defining intelligence. I do think artificial intelligence can be achieved by making artificial intelligence a multidiscipline endeavor with biological engineering at its core, not computer science. See the work of Michael Levin to see real intelligence in action: [this video]
Levin's work as example of real intelligence.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close