HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from TWiV 641: COVID-19 with Dr. Anthony Fauci Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

TWiV 641: COVID-19 with Dr. Anthony Fauci

MicrobeTV
Interviews
YouTube
Cited on HN 3 times, 2020–2021, never outright recommended score 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited in debates over PCR cycle thresholds, as a place where Fauci addressed them directly.

Dr. Anthony Fauci joins the This Week in Virology podcast to discuss SARS-CoV-2 transmission, testing, immunity, vaccines and preparedness.

“Here's Fauci talking about it a little” (HN, 2020)

3 citations · Interviews · intermediate · news from the time

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@jorge-fundido Nov 2020 Cites it
on HN thread South Dakota nurse says many dying patients still insist Covid-19 'not real'
Why are cases important? Assuming PCR, can get whatever result you want with the cycle threshold (discussion begins around minute 3:50): [this video] Want more positive cases? Use a higher threshold. Want to scare the population into compliance? Use a higher threshold. Want to demonstrate that person X or policy Y was effective against stopping spread? Use a lower threshold.
Cited for claim about PCR cycle thresholds.
@tertius Dec 2020 Cites it
on HN thread FDA grants authorization to Moderna's Covid-19 vaccine
PCR positive doesn't mean infected. You'll need an high amount in PCR, i.e. low cycle threshold for the probability to be high. Antigen tests will show if there was/is an infection. PCR does not show infection only presence. (WHO has now put out guidance about this. They don't have to it's well known.) If you're European this may be strange to you but I'm the U.S. we don't receive the cycle count when the RNA for the virus is detected. Here's Fauci talking about it a little: [this video]
Fauci discussing PCR cycle thresholds.
@sleepysysadmin Mar 2021 Cites it
on HN thread Yes, experts will lie to you sometimes
Read more
>That's not a false positive. False positive happens when there are no viral particles in the sample, but the test comes back positive. Those are very rare with rt-PCR and can usually be tracked down to cross-contamination. Cycle count has nothing to with those. You're not arguing with me. You are arguing with Fauci. [this video] If you could explain to me if you don't mind. Why are you saying Fauci is wrong? Was he lying again? >If there is no SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in the sample, there's nothing for rt-PCR to amplify. I made my entire post literally Fauci and not me at all. I made no comments or assertions.
Cited as Fauci statement in a debate over PCR cycle counts.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close