2 HN users recommended this explainer2 months2021–2023score 2
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Cited as support for the claim that chemicals affect amphibian sex and as an example of corporate influence over regulation.
A long video essay on the claim that chemicals such as atrazine are feminizing frogs. It covers the science, the EPA and the role of chemical companies.
“(this whole video is a gem, but ~13:30 is the relevant bit)” (HN, 2023)
It's even worse: the chemical companies also get to dictate what science is allowed to be considered. [this video] (this whole video is a gem, but ~13:30 is the relevant bit)
Shows chemical companies shaping what science is considered.
It seems to me that the EPA has been totally captured by corporate interests. It's hard to listen to stories about decisions they've made, for example approving Atrazine[0] despite the protests of the scientific advisors, and have any confidence that they'll actually make a meaningful impact. [0] [this video]
Covers EPA approval of Atrazine against scientific advice.
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
5 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Citations, criticism and jokes