HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Why Planes Don't Fly Faster Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Why Planes Don't Fly Faster

23 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
3 HN users recommended this explainer3 months2018–2022 score 3.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Recommended as a clear economic explanation of aviation tradeoffs, relevant to Concorde and supersonic startup threads.

Wendover Productions explains why modern airliners fly no faster than they did decades ago, covering the economics of speed and fuel efficiency, and why supersonic travel faded.

“airplanes used to fly much faster in the 1960s than they do today.” (HN, 2018)

1 strong recommendations · 2 recommendations · 1 citations · Explainers

4 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@sillysaurus3 Jan 2018 Strongly recommends
on HN thread As of today, no US passenger airlines operate the Boeing 747
If anyone finds the operation of airlines a fascinating topic, you might like Wendover Productions: [link] How airlines price flights [link] The little plane war [link] Why planes don't fly faster [this video] The economics of Airline Class [link] How airlines schedule flights [link] I just recently found the channel. So much good stuff. (My unrelated favorite is [link] How the US government will survive doomsday.)
Why planes don't fly faster, among Wendover's airline videos.
@ckocagil Jul 2018 Recommends
on HN thread Is killing the boom the key to supersonic air travel?
This reminds me of a Wendover video I've seen. The author discovers that airplanes used to fly much faster in the 1960s than they do today. So our flight times have actually gone up! He then explains the reasons behind it. [this video]
Planes flew faster in the 1960s; explains why not now.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@andruby Aug 2022 Cites it
on HN thread American Airlines agrees to purchase Boom Supersonic Overture aircraft
I’m not sure that it would even be larger now than before. Subsonic flight has become much more efficient, cheaper and when paying for higher class, more comfortable. This is one of the reasons often mentioned for the economic demise of the concorde. The audience willing to pay $6000 on a concorde ticket, could now spend $4000 on first class subsonic with a seat that fully reclines into a bed. They can fly a little longer at night but sleep the whole journey. Wendover did a good economic analysis of the concorde: [this video]
Economic analysis of Concorde's demise.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close