HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from The wings on this Airbus flex way more than they should Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

The wings on this Airbus flex way more than they should

Insider
Demos
YouTube
Cited on HN 3 times, 2018–2025, never outright recommended score 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN commenters link it to show how much stress airliner wings are designed to withstand, especially in turbulence and crash threads.

A one-minute clip from Insider showing an Airbus airliner's wings flexing far more than most people expect during a wing load test. It is meant to reassure nervous flyers about turbulence.

“see how much airplane wings can bend without breaking” (HN, 2018)

3 citations · Demos

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@Pyxl101 Oct 2018 Cites it
on HN thread Less Turbulence on Delta Flights?
When I hit turbulence, I just try to keep in mind that airplanes are extremely robust and can handle considerably more turbulence than a typical person might imagine. For example, see how much airplane wings can bend without breaking: [this video]
Shows how far airliner wings can flex without breaking.
@bparsons Jun 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Is Clear Air Turbulence becoming more common?
Commercial airliners are built for extraordinary stress on the airframe. You can get a taste of it here: [this video] Other people will correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the last time a large commercial airliner was lost to turbulence was 1966. [link]
Gives a taste of the stress airliner airframes are built for.
@mrguyorama Feb 2025 Cites it
on HN thread Plane crashes, overturns during landing at Toronto airport
Read more
Nah, an engine getting ripped off will not tear off the wing since this is the level of force and flex they are designed to withstand: [this video] The engines are built to rip off cleanly, because when they don't, they have caused [link] and [link] which were fairly serious and catastrophic accidents at least partially caused by the engines tearing off and damaging the wing in such a serious manner as to cause a stall and crash. The wings stayed on the aircraft in both instances. Interestingly, both accidents were caused by those same sheer pins being damaged in minor and unpredicted ways. I highly doubt the wing is DESIGNED to cleanly separate. Planes are just very not rigid for something going such a high speed, and so tend to turn into confetti when faced with a harder surface, like a runway or a concrete building. Usually the only parts that survive serious crashes are the landing gear struts.
Shows the force and flex airplane wings are designed to withstand.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close