Cited on HN 3 times, 2021–2025, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
Linked in lift-theory arguments as a clear demonstration that air over the top of a wing does not need to catch up with air underneath.
A one-minute clip from Cambridge's Prof. Holger Babinsky that debunks the equal transit time explanation of lift. It shows how air actually flows over a wing.
“This[1] video has a very good demonstration of this.” (HN, 2021)
You're right- there isn't, and it doesn't. In fact a parcel of air moving over the top of the wing will beat its counterpart moving below it to the trailing edge. This[1] video has a very good demonstration of this. (Relevant part begins around 0:25.) So saying that air on top of the wing moves faster, creating a pressure differential and thus lift, is absolutely correct. The problem begins when some people try to come up with an intuitive explanation for _why_ the air would need to speed up. "Because this is the lowest energy state that conserves energy, momentum, and mass" isn't a very satisfying answer; neither is "because this system of PDEs say so"; so they came up with the "equal transit time" explanation, which is simple, intuitive, and completely wrong. Hopefully aeronautical engineers at P&W didn't actually believe that last bit? [1] [this video]
Demonstrates air over a wing does not follow equal transit time
Funnily enough, there's another web page on the NASA domain that outlines the "longer path" or "equal transit" theories as the correct cause of lift on an aircraft wing: [link] When I was studying for my PPL, they taught us using the equal transit theory, though the instructor couldn't help himself from telling us that it was a simplification. This video from Cambridge University illustrates what happens to the airflow over an aerofoil: [this video]
> right, the other is that if you remove every incorrect statement from the AI "explanation", the answer it would have given is "airplane wings generate lift because they are shaped to generate lift". ...only if you omit the parts where it talks about pressure differentials, caused by airspeed differences, create lift? Both of these points are true. You have to be motivated to ignore them. [this video]
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
3 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more