HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from IBM Selectric Typewriter & its digital to analogue converter Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

IBM Selectric Typewriter & its digital to analogue converter

5 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
4 HN users recommended this explainer5 months2016–2025 score 5.5
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

HN commenters recommend it whenever the Selectric comes up, as a short, excellent explanation of its internals.

Bill Hammack of engineerguy uses slow motion video to show how the IBM Selectric typewriter works. He focuses on its fully mechanical digital-to-analog converter, which turns key presses into rotation of the type ball.

“I highly recommend watching” (HN, 2023)

1 strong recommendations · 4 recommendations · 3 citations · Explainers

8 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@golem14 Jun 2023 Recommends
on HN thread How to make your own Selectric Typeballs
To deepen the wonder, I'd be interested to see the longevity per material (PLA/Nylon/metal/...). I'd expect a lot of trial and error to deal with shrinkage and the probably high precision needed by the Selectric. But this is a great repository, thanks a lot! P.S. excellent short video by Bill Hammack on the Selectric internals: [this video]
Short look at Selectric internals

Citations, criticism and jokes

@hwillis Jan 2018 Cites it
on HN thread Operation Gunman – how the Soviets bugged IBM typewriters (2015)
As in, were they fast enough to be used with other layouts? Yeah, but this was back when letters were dictated- secretaries didn't go switching to dvorak. Any typewriter could technically use any layout, since you'd just have to swap out the characters. The biggest advantage of the selectric was that you could swap out the ball to get different characters or fonts. The ability to get italics was a pretty big deal. Here's Bill Hammond talking about them: [this video]
Explains Selectric swappable typeballs
@pas May 2018 Cites it
on HN thread Will Kubernetes Collapse Under the Weight of Its Complexity?
Read more
A distributed system will never be as intuitive as MS Word, which is basically the digitized version of stone tables, or papyrus, or whatever thousands of years old thing we are already familiar with. Or just remain a bit more strict and look at typewriters. Word is a typewriter. People look at typewriters and sort of understand them after pushing one-two buttons. Yes, there are hidden gems and details and a long road from mechanical typewriters to Word and laser printers (e.g. [this video] ), but people are a lot more intuitive about these pieces of hardware and software, because they are simply updates on existing tech. Distributed systems is a new, and hitherto an explicitly unknown concept for many people. And with minikube you can set up k8s as easily as MS Office. (Or you can use Typhoon [link] .. ) And it's trivial to package up all this into a website, like Office 365 and GKE [link] . Or you can run it on your own PC with minikube and Virtualbox/KVM/qemu, and similarly you can install Office locally. But it does not make sense for one and it increasingly makes less for the other too.
Example of hidden complexity behind familiar hardware

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close