Cited on HN 4 times, 2012–2020, never outright recommendedscore 0
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026
HN references it as the first Grasshopper test flight, a milestone in the history of reusable rockets.
SpaceX footage of the Grasshopper vertical takeoff and landing test vehicle making its first roughly 6-foot hop in McGregor, Texas, on September 21, 2012. It was an early step toward a reusable Falcon 9 first stage.
This follows from the first test flight in late-September [this video] . > "Testing of Grasshopper continues, with the next big milestone -- a hover at roughly 100 feet -- expected in the next several months." This is preparation for the vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) rocket SpaceX wants to build [link] And the reason why they're doing this: [link] > But a fully reusable rocket could change the equation dramatically. Musk illustrated the point by citing SpaceX's Falcon 9, which costs between $50 million to $60 million per launch in its current configuration. > "But the cost of the fuel and oxygen and so forth is only about $200,000," Musk said."So obviously, if we can reuse the rocket, say, a thousand times, then that would make the capital cost of the rocket for launch only about $50,000."
This follows from the first test flight in late-September [this video] . > "Testing of Grasshopper continues, with the next big milestone -- a hover at roughly 100 feet -- expected in the next several months." This is preparation for the vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) rocket SpaceX wants to build [link] And the reason why they're doing this: [link] > But a fully reusable rocket could change the equation dramatically. Musk illustrated the point by citing SpaceX's Falcon 9, which costs between $50 million to $60 million per launch in its current configuration. > "But the cost of the fuel and oxygen and so forth is only about $200,000," Musk said."So obviously, if we can reuse the rocket, say, a thousand times, then that would make the capital cost of the rocket for launch only about $50,000." (Resubmission of [link] . I rarely resubmit, but this really is HN material and warrants quality discussion)
I upvoted this thinking it was a new test, but sadly this is an older result from two months ago. To make amends for upvoting without reading the article, here is the history of Grasshopper's public flights Date Altitude Duration Youtube 2012-09-21 1.8 m 3 seconds [this video] 2012-11-01 5.4 m 8 seconds [link] 2012-12-17 40 m 29 seconds [link] 2013-03-07 80 m 34 seconds [link] 2013-04-17 250 m 61 seconds [link] 2013-06-14 325 m 68 seconds [link]
Very few rocket launches end with any kind of soft landing, let alone main boosters. Soft-landing a small payload, or in the case of the shuttle, a winged reentry vehicle, is the exception. (And yes, the Shuttle also soft-ish watered its SRBs underr chutes.) Retrorocket-soft-landing intact boosters from production launches fully upright was science fiction until four years ago. [link] The test platform was first hopped in 2012, only 8 years ago. [this video] (I'm not a Musk fanboi,I thought the powered landing was nuts, he proved me wrong.)
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
4 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more
Read more