When you dive into it, there are problems with this theory. PBS SpaceTime did pretty good coverage of it[0]. Each non-dark matter theory (i.e. MOND, primordial blackholes effort) usually has some pretty large glaring issue that's unsolvable. I'm all game to refute dark-matter but still waiting for the contender that fits the observations[1]. [0] [this video] [1] [link]
Covers the problems with primordial black hole dark matter theory.
Got it. The reference is great, the only final addendum I wanted to mention was whether a neutron stars densities would stop a black hole in its tracks since the paper only talks about the black hole already having been there. (At least to remove the amateur recollection of mine from the reference link, the mention of this possibility happens in the video at 6:18 [this video] ) and here’s them talking about a BH punching through earth which seems roughly in line with what you say as well! [link]
Mentions black holes stopped by neutron stars at 6:18.
This was covered by PBS spacetime: [this video] Still possible, but increasingly unlikely due to the narrowing size range in which these black holes are allowed to exist in.
Covers primordial black holes as dark matter, increasingly unlikely.
(sorry only available on youtube, they no longer seem to mirror on pbs.org ) If you aren't familiar with Matt, yes he is at least 50% Neanderthal but also brilliant, lol btw I owe @api an apology, apparently black holes could indeed be dark matter, I missed this one from Matt a few years ago (or forgot the lesson) [this video] (actually by the end of that video Matt demonstrates point by point that there aren't enough black holes to be dark matter for several reasons/types, their mass doesn't add up enough, there would have to be more micro-sized black holes than all the stars in the universe and we'd be observing some really strange behaviors if that was the case, like disappearing neutron stars - just a few edge cases are left)
Shows there are not enough black holes to account for dark matter.
That was my first thought too. A cursory search indicates we would see a lot more gravitational lensing in our observations if that was the case. Found a couple of videos on it too [this video] [link]
Videos on why lensing observations rule out black hole dark matter.
This PBS Spacetime video pours some cold water on the black holes as dark matter hypothesis: [this video] It’s 4 years old; I don’t know if this JWST finding changes anything. I do know we have finally found some (one?) intermediate-mass black holes in the interim, but I don’t know if that changes it either. The possibility it leaves open for “Planck relics” is interestingly exotic
Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.
Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed
6 Hacker News comments
From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.
Read more