HackerTubewatch
Surprise me
Frame from Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION? Plays via YouTube's privacy-enhanced embed

Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION?

12 videos recommended on HN
YouTube
1 HN user recommended this explainer1 month2020–2024 score 1
Years with an HN recommendation, 2007–2026

Cited as a mathematician's debunking of numerical claims of 2020 election fraud.

Matt Parker of Stand-up Maths examines the Texas Supreme Court filing claiming Biden's 2020 win had a one-in-a-quadrillion chance. He walks through why the statistical argument is flawed.

“has analyzed some of the numerical allegations of fraud” (HN, 2020)

1 recommendations · 1 citations · 1 critical · Explainers · news from the time

3 Hacker News comments

From the HN archive; up to 20 kept per video, favoring different commenters. Recommendations first.

@nitrogen Dec 2020 Recommends
on HN thread California Public Utilities Commission fired director who exposed missing $200M
I am replying for the sake of the hidden sibling comment: I don't watch any major media coverage of politics, but a mathematician and comedian I follow on YouTube (from a different country who presumably has no horse in the race) has analyzed some of the numerical allegations of fraud: - [this video] - [link] - [link]
Mathematician analyzes numerical claims of 2020 election fraud.

Citations, criticism and jokes

@nick238 Aug 2024 Cites it
on HN thread Suspicious data pattern in recent Venezuelan election
Read more
There were some pretty shit analysises of the 2020 US elections that Matt Parker covered with videos like "Why do Biden's votes not follow Benford's law?"[1] and "Why was Biden's win calculated to be 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000?"[2]. I don't know about other countries, but the amount of data that every county in every US state produces makes systematic fraud pretty much impossible. If there's literally only 3 numbers produced by the Venezuelan government, you need to be seriously incompetent to have detectable fraud because techniques like Benford's or Zipf's law need lots of individual numbers. [1]: [link] [2]: [this video]
Debunks a flawed statistical claim about 2020 US election results.
@ehsankia Jan 2021 Pushes back
on HN thread U.S. Capitol Locked Down Amid Escalating Protests
> Can you link me to those majority of cases? [link] [link] And this third one just shows how much of a joke some of the claims in the lawsuits are: [this video] Like, this is basic high school level statistics they can't even get right.

Video list and Hacker News comment labels from HackerTube (prompted by @karpathy), released under ODC-By 1.0, built on the open-index/hacker-news archive. Hacker News data is provided by Y Combinator; comments remain the work of their authors. Video titles, channel names and thumbnails belong to their creators and are shown via YouTube. HackerTube Watch is an unofficial edition. Data export of 2026-10-31.

Keyboard shortcuts

/
Search
j k
Next / previous video
r
Surprise me
l
Like (video page)
w
Watch later (video page)
?
This help
Esc
Close